tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7610074516299275060.post3425439095625611994..comments2024-01-21T11:18:54.087-05:00Comments on Lost in the Movies: So what's so special about Oct. 22, 2010??Joel Bockohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11238338958380683893noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7610074516299275060.post-44239897982140350122011-04-18T08:59:07.712-04:002011-04-18T08:59:07.712-04:00UPDATE: Looking at traffic sources in the stat sec...UPDATE: Looking at traffic sources in the stat section, I feel confident in saying that it's definitely Monica Belluci who's driving the traffic.<br /><br />That's cheating, but the right kind of cheating I think. :)Joel Bockohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11238338958380683893noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7610074516299275060.post-51532928046184107272011-04-14T11:34:55.119-04:002011-04-14T11:34:55.119-04:00Re: Monica Bellucci... indeed. It's a funny ol...Re: Monica Bellucci... indeed. It's a funny old world out here on the Internet. So few read, but everybody's looking.<br /><br />I wanted to mention how glad I am that you bubbled up your Twin Peaks series, as it prompted me to finally open up my copy of the gold box that I got so cheaply a few months ago. I was an irregular fan way back but had forgotten much of it and missed many episodes anyway. It's been a real eye-opener returning to it again and I look forward to going through all your pieces more carefully once I'm through it. The intro pieces are great, and I love what some of the commenters bring too, such as Tony Dayoub.Jeff Pikehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17148737647138431543noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7610074516299275060.post-73880137582285347382011-04-13T14:32:30.591-04:002011-04-13T14:32:30.591-04:00Thanks, JPK - I like that idea much better than th...Thanks, JPK - I like that idea much better than the notion that it's just spam! I mean, who doesn't like Monica Bellucci?Joel Bockohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11238338958380683893noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7610074516299275060.post-864615480675418772011-04-12T17:38:47.270-04:002011-04-12T17:38:47.270-04:00My guess is it's the Monica Bellucci pic, espe...My guess is it's the Monica Bellucci pic, especially as it includes her full name. At my place a review of The Ring (also from last October) has a picture of Amber Tamblyn and though the pic name does not include her name it does have the entire name of the movie (usually I label my pics with fragments of titles and/or artists). On days when it comes up on a Google search of her name and that movie (seems to be a matter of rotation, some days it does, some days not), it's still driving traffic like crazy and makes me feel like somehow I cheated. Although now and then some of those visitors seem to be sticking around and evidently reading, so there's that too.Jeff Pikehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17148737647138431543noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7610074516299275060.post-83681551260536274682011-04-11T11:29:18.674-04:002011-04-11T11:29:18.674-04:00Interesting - why doesn't it show up in the st...Interesting - why doesn't it show up in the stats though? And is there a way to exclude them so that the "popular posts" standings aren't effected? I guess, technically speaking, it's a "popular post" but that's rather misleading...Joel Bockohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11238338958380683893noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7610074516299275060.post-3503162000105985032011-04-11T10:07:15.177-04:002011-04-11T10:07:15.177-04:00Sounds like it might be a spam referrer. I get loa...Sounds like it might be a spam referrer. I get loads of them at my Wordpress blog.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com