Lost in the Movies

Mad Men - "The Chrysanthemum and the Sword" (season 4, episode 5)


Welcome to my viewing diary for Mad Men. Every Monday I will review another episode of seasons four, five, and six. The last season will be covered in the summer of 2022 (now updated to winter 2021-22). I have never seen this series before so there will be NO spoilers.

Story (aired on August 22, 2010/written by Erin Levy; directed by Lesli Linka Glatter): "The Chrysanthemum and the Sword" points both backward and forward while anchoring itself very firmly in the moment. The Japanese motorcycle company Honda becomes a potential goldmine client for SCDP, triggering a furious Roger's war-fueled resentments from the forties while hinting at the Pacific nation's eventual dominance of the auto industry in the eighties. (The notion of Japanese cars seems so absurd to the admen that, when they learn they have a shot at marketing the company's brand new models, they wonder if they really want to.) After Roger ambushes a business meeting with ratatatat insults involving barely-veiled references to Pearl Harbor and the atomic bomb, a furious Pete accuses him of having ulterior motives: is this really about promises made to dead sailor pals or is Roger worried that if Pete starts bringing in big hitters, Roger's own Lucky Strike account will carry less weight? Don nearly salvages the account when he cooks up a plan almost as conniving as the legendary creation of SCDP in '63 - he pretends to shoot an expensive spec commercial, in direct violation of the Japanese business' scrupulously written rules, in order to provoke his obnoxious rival at the CGC agency, Ted Chaough (Kevin Rahm), into filming his own ad. Then Don self-righteously removes himself from the competition by telling the Honda reps that it would be dishonorable to compete against someone who flouted their conventions so brazenly. Don, reading the postwar anthropological study from which the episode takes its name, believes he's got a solid read on their cultural conventions; we'll see whether or not this stunt pays off in the long run, but early signs are promising. At any rate Ted faceplants, which is good enough.

While Don continues to thrive professionally, he's flailing in his personal life. A visit with his kids in the city heads south when he leaves them with a babysitter (neighbor Phoebe, whose unflappable demeanor in previous episodes collapses to the point where she is humiliatingly fired by Don). Sally decides to cut her hair, leading to an outburst from Betty who is particularly pissed that Don pranced off with a date rather than watch the kids himself during his one night a week. She's also alarmed by indications that the little girl is growing up all too fast. Encouraged by Henry to go easy on the kid, Betty lets Sally attend a sleepover which backfires disastrously. As her unsuspecting friend slumbers on the couch, Sally becomes ever more fascinated with the handsome men on TV and - tactfully, under the notable guidance of a female writer and director - we quickly find out how few inhibitions Sally harbors...as does her friend's mother (Amy Sloan). Deposited back at the Draper home as punishment for "playing with herself," the humiliated Sally is more confused and morose than ever and so Betty agrees, with Harry's prodding, to send her to a child psychiatrist, Dr. Edna Keener (Patricia Bethune). As quickly becomes apparent in their first meeting, it's Betty who needs a therapeutic outlet as much as anyone; we're right back in Betty's first season childishness as she sits in the playfully decorated office and starts inadvertently spilling her own guts to the intrigued shrink, who carefully sets up monthly meetings with mother as well as daughter - ostensibly just to check up on the child's progress. Don, kept abreast of his daughter's crisis from a distance, finds his own solace over sake with Faye in the company kitchen, finally sharing the familial troubles he withheld for so long. She, in turn, confesses that she wears a fake wedding ring as a prop to keep men away, although Don is quick to note that he must, implicitly, not be one of the ones she wants to keep away. Faye is able to exit this encounter without going any further, but we strongly suspect this won't be their last temptation to further let down their guard.

My Response:

belated March 2021 Patreon podcasts: LOST IN TWIN PEAKS #26 - Season 2 Episode 18 and LOST IN THE MOVIES #77 - Blue Velvet in Twin Peaks Cinema, Opening the Archive & Twin Peaks Reflections (w/ Jean framing Cooper) + Film in Focus: Blue Velvet Revisited documentary (+ more Twin Peaks Reflections: Denise, Betty & the Briggs home, Dead Dog Farm & more)


I never realized how much I'd discussed Blue Velvet before - and how much I still had to say about it - until composing this multipart podcast (and assembling the public episode on Blue Velvet as a standalone film, which is a tie-in to this). David Lynch's eighties breakthrough was the movie which took him from being an avant-garde cult-figure (beginning to turn semi-mainstream director-for-hire) to a full-blown auteur whose name could be used as a commonly understood adjective. The story of a curious young man discovering dark sexual and criminal secrets in an all-American small town (or small city?), the 1986 feature also directly paved the way for his 1990 TV series which was both enabled by Blue Velvet's success and dependent upon borrowing and expanding narrative and stylistic aspects of the previous work. Those ties are the focus of my longest "Twin Peaks Cinema" discussion ever - challenged only by my episode on Mulholland Drive - but the subject spills out into other parts of the episode as well. In my "Twin Peaks Reflections" section, I relate a routine second season subplot to the ostensibly less genre-focused Velvet. And when I opened my archive to revisit my previous coverage of the film, I had so much material that in addition to reading three full essays in the main episode I had to spin off three decent-sized bonus episodes too.

When I watched the Criterion Collection blu-ray, I was surprised to discover that I'd never actually seen the bonus avant-garde documentary Blue Velvet Revisited, even though I'd wanted to for years. In fact I was so taken with this particular work - a gorgeous Super 8 restoration of footage shot on the North Carolina location in the mid-eighties alongside black-and-white photos, recordings of cast and crew talking off the cuff, and latter-day moody music and editing flourishes - that I devoted an entire "Film in Focus" section to it. Not only the peek behind the scenes of this unique production but the aching exploration of another era and its zeitgeist completely captivated me, sparking personal as well as cinematic musings. Inspired simply by the realization that my scheduled March "Reflections" subject, just a few minutes of material for the podcast, would include Blue Velvet, I ended up assembling a sprawling analysis of/meditation on a Lynch project that has both fascinated and frustrated me for years. It took a couple weeks for me to catch up and my "Lost in Twin Peaks" podcast also got delayed in the mix, although this allowed it to go up on the episode's thirtieth anniversary. Hopefully you find all of this worth the wait and have some of your own thoughts to share.

Mad Men - "The Rejected" (season 4, episode 4)


Welcome to my viewing diary for Mad Men. Every Monday I will review another episode of seasons four, five, and six. The last season will be covered in the summer of 2022 (now updated to winter 2021-22). I have never seen this series before so there will be NO spoilers.

Story (aired on August 15, 2010/written by Keith Huff and Matthew Weiner; directed by John Slattery): Connections forged, broken, and wistfully recalled define our first full venture in 1965. Allison, suffering in silence for weeks, breaks down during a Pond's Cream meeting supervised by Faye. Ostensibly gathered to discuss their make-up regimens, the focus group of secretaries quickly turn toward man problems and Allison runs from the room. Don, already discomfited by her broken gazes toward the two-way mirror (through which she knows he is watching her), tries to apologize and smooth things over but instead she asks him to write a recommendation letter. Offering to sign anything she composes, Don's generous intent is read (perhaps correctly) as casual indifference and Allison hurls a desk ornament across the room in rage before a second, and final, dramatic exit. The whole office now knows, more or less, what happened between these two. On a more pleasant note, Peggy befriends Joyce Ramsay (Zosia Mamet), a LIFE Magazine photo editor who works below her in the same building. After struggling for years to find her place in New York's social universe, Peggy clicks with Joyce's hipster bohemian circle, sharing pot at avant-garde loft parties and making out in a closet with Abe Drexler (Charlie Hofheimer), an independent reporter, during a police raid. Joyce's undisguised more-than-friendly interest in Peggy, whom she tries to kiss, may complicate the camaraderie but for now everything is falling into place.

The same is true for Pete following years of marital struggle with infertility, infidelity, and in-law tension over adoption. Pete discovers he's going to be a father after all, right as he's supposed to break bad business news to his own father-in-law (and client, whose Clearasil account is about to be dropped). Later he will flip that bad news on its head, at least for himself, strong-arming Tom into bringing his entire conglomerate - Vicks Chemical - over to SCDP. Called a "son of a bitch" by the soon-to-be-grandfather, Pete just shrugs; his youthful petulance has, with time, matured into a more worldly ruthlessness. But not too worldly: when a gut-punched Peggy congratulates him on impending fatherhood, hints of shame, regret, and confusion flicker across his face - a look that returns as he and Peggy stand apart at the end of the work day. She gathers with her lively, colorful friends near the elevator, he stands on the other side of the glass partition with gray-suited admen in whose ranks he is quickly rising. Both have done well for themselves, though his path to the top is clearer, and both appear to be hitting their stride after many awkward false starts and detours. But they are headed in very different directions, one toward the greatest generation fifties ideal of the nuclear family, the other toward the baby boomer seventies ideal of swinging singledom. The divided screen provides a perfect microcosm of the silent generation, split right down its middle.

My Response:

Blue Velvet (LOST IN THE MOVIES podcast #19)



The patron follow-up Twin Peaks/Blue Velvet comparison is now available.

Today is the thirty-first anniversary of the Twin Peaks pilot, when David Lynch changed television forever in the form of a surreal mystery set in a small town. Four years before that, however, he'd told a similar story in cinematic form with Blue Velvet. I will be comparing those two works on a Patreon podcast which should be available in the next day or two - but first, for this public podcast I wanted to share a discussion I recorded three years ago; consider these "part one" and "part two," especially as this episode ends with a few thoughts on how Velvet relates to the The Return via the presence of Kyle MacLachlan and Laura Dern. I also cover the film's stylistic and tonal relationship to other Lynch films, some of the deleted scenes, the influence of Lynch's upbringing in different types of areas, the suburban vs. urban feel of the setting, the effect of perspective on an amoral (not just immoral) milieu, the legacy of the sixties onscreen and offscreen, and more outlandish theories - mine and others' - about what's "really" going on. Links to my previous work on the film are included below, and I'll be reading (or sampling) from them on the patron podcast too, as part of my archive section - in addition to a special section of my "Twin Peaks Reflections" in which I specifically relate the "Jean Renault's drug scheme" storyline from season two to Blue Velvet. If you're interested in becoming a patron but haven't taken the jump yet, this month is the perfect time, not only for the extension of this podcast but because I will be releasing a Straight Story patron episode in April as well.


Subscribe, rate, and review on Apple Podcasts
You can also listen on Pinecast and Spotify
(and most places podcasts are found)

The follow-up to this podcast - patron coverage of Blue Velvet as "Twin Peaks Cinema" - is now available HERE.


LINKS FOR EPISODE 19

MY PREVIOUS WORK ON THIS FILM


Take This Baby and Deliver it to Death (non-narrated video essay focused on how Lynch's early films - including Blue Velvet - depict violence and assign the roles of abuser, victim, and rescuer)



Journey Through Twin Peaks chapter 27: Opening the Door (video essay exploring how Twin Peaks represents a shift in Lynch's work and how it affected his later films, includes one clip from Blue Velvet) - see still images here

Blue Velvet & The Duchess of Langeais (reviewing a double feature from the David Lynch/Jacques Rivette retrospective at Lincoln Center)


MY RECENT WORK

New on the site



New on Patreon
($1/ month)


($5/month)





Mad Men - "The Good News" (season 4, episode 3)


Welcome to my viewing diary for Mad Men. Every Monday I will review another episode of seasons four, five, and six. The last season will be covered in the summer of 2022 (now updated to winter 2021-22). I have never seen this series before so there will be NO spoilers.

Story (aired on August 8, 2010/written by Jonathan Abrahams and Matthew Weiner; directed by Jennifer Getzinger): A year ago, Don Draper found himself in the midst of a contentious divorce and radical workplace shakeup - he did not have the mental space to do much other than act and react. Now, as 1964 gives way to 1965, he has all too much space and time: While employees like Joan plead vainly with Lane for a longer vacation (her husband is headed to Vietnam in a couple months and this may be their last chance to get away), Don wanders off to Mexico with a sense of obligation and resignation, of "I guess this is just what bachelors do," rather than excitement. However, he never makes it to Acapulco. A short stopover in L.A. to visit Anna initially yields minor bittersweet bemusement; her water-stained wall needs painting, and he quickly decides her bohemian college student niece Stephanie (Caity Lotz) needs something else (is it just my faulty memory or did the always-horny Don once show a modicum of restraint?). Happy to be in a place where he can just be known as old family friend Dick sleeping on the couch, this particular trek to the Pacific is not intended to resolve or temper an existential crisis, but simply to find momentary comfort in the midst of general spiritual exhaustion. Instead, he's confronted with the dying of even this flickering, modest little light: when he attempts to bed Stephanie, she gently tells him that Aunt Anna is dying of cancer but doesn't know it. The next morning her mother Patty, who doesn't disguise her contempt for Don, dismisses him as "a guy in a room somewhere writing checks" and demands that he not ruin Anna's final months. Despite immense reservations, he complies - maybe as much out of a low opinion of his own significance as respect for the woman who helped him the most and asked the least.

Back in New York, Joan - staging an indoor tropical dinner straight out of the sham honeymoon in It's a Wonderful Life - is touched by Greg's usefulness as he stitches her up. In this moment at least, she can feel she is part of a caring, reciprocal relationship while the more powerful Lane is not. (Ironically, this revelation is achieved when Greg adopts his professional, rather than domestic, persona.) There is a hint that Lane's pennypinching refusal to allow the Harrises their getaway arises from his own resentful jealousy. When Joan receives roses from Lane with a card reading "Darling, I've been an ass. Kisses, Lane," it quickly comes out that his secretary confused two gifts: the more formal apology intended for her and this personal attempt at reconciliation intended for his wife, soon to be ex-wife, in London. Don finds a lonely Lane in the office by himself on New Year's Eve; without the heart to go to Acapulco, instead he gets stinking drunk with his partner, heading out to a comedy club where they're ridiculed as a gay couple until their call girl dates show up. They entertain themselves throughout the night, a different version of the relax-and-just-enjoy-the-moment energy Don experienced with Anna and Stephanie, but when morning comes he's left with the same facts he confronted in December: a job with little joy, non-working hours to fill with drinking, screwing, and other distractions, another year passing by, like all the others have and will, until the day when it's as if none of them ever happened at all.

My Response:

belated February 2021 Patreon podcasts: LOST IN TWIN PEAKS #25 - Season 2 Episode 17 and LOST IN THE MOVIES #76 - Twin Peaks Cinema: Kings Row / Political Reflections: Pandemic, Protest, Election, Insurrection & The Future (+ Us, Brideshead Revisited, documentaries on the Roosevelts, Reagan, and Lee Atwater, podcast recommendations, listener feedback, Twin Peaks Reflections: Nicky, Dougie, Hide-Out Wallie's, Timber Falls Motel, Milford family/The Secret History & more)


I promised this one - or rather, these ones - a long time ago, but kept postponing. The bonus sections, featuring film capsules, podcast recommendations, political reflections, and listener feedback, were originally planned for the summer but work on Journey Through Twin Peaks videos pushed them back to February (same with my "Twin Peaks Cinema" coverage of the dark small town melodrama Kings Row, starring Ronald Reagan, which I wanted to discuss in conjunction with a documentary on the fortieth president). Then, for complicated reasons, I found myself working on several projects simultaneously while also traveling for the first time since the pandemic began (as well as getting sucked into the drama surrounding the stimulus vote in Congress) - so the "February" podcasts ended up getting published in March.

Hopefully, the material was worth the wait. Kings Row was a particularly fascinating work to dig into between its social drama, psychological motifs, and dark family dynamics; it makes an interesting comparison point not just to Peaks but to other films discussed as "Twin Peaks Cinema" like Peyton Place and Our Town. Only after recording was I reminded that the same director, Sam Wood, helmed both Our Town and Kings Row - so perhaps I'll have more to say on those films from that angle in the future. At one point, I also hoped to offer full "film in focus" reviews on the 2019 horror film Us, Jordan Peele's clever, twisty follow-up to Get Out (which I reviewed a couple years ago), and Brideshead Revisited, the definitive arthouse-TV literary adaptation. Although I ended up shaving them down to extended capsules, I will definitely be revisiting both titles in other mediums.

Elsewhere, listener feedback ranged across numerous aspects of Twin Peaks (from the zeitgeist of its different eras to the collaboration between Lynch and Frost to its impact on multiple video games). Podcast recommendations on historical, cinematic, and political subjects were divided into four mini-episodes with all the accompanying links in the show notes. And my political reflections ended up standing on their own as a ninety-minute episode...unsurprisingly, given that 2020 was arguably the most historically significant year in America since 1968 even if just for the pandemic (which takes up less than ten minutes, although it hovers in the background of everything else).

That's just a small sample of what's in these podcasts; I even had to excise and save more than half the film capsules and the Journey Through Twin Peaks feedback for upcoming episodes. I did get up my belated Lost in Twin Peaks coverage of the comeback (?) episode where the late second season really begins, which was also meant to publish in February. My "March" rewards will be a little late too, but only by days in this case. So stay tuned. Meanwhile, here are links to all the podcasts, followed by a detailed rundown of the content for each one....













Podcast Line-Ups for...

Mad Men - "Christmas Comes But Once a Year" (season 4, episode 2)


Welcome to my viewing diary for Mad Men. Every Monday I will review another episode of seasons four, five, and six. The last season will be covered in the summer of 2022. I have never seen this series before so there will be NO spoilers.

Story (aired on August 1, 2010/written by Tracy McMillan and Matthew Weiner; directed by Michael Uppendahl): Add another holiday to the Mad Men canon (when my viewing diary closes, I'll have to compose a visual tribute encompassing all of them). Although the last season finale came close on the calendar, I don't believe we've run all the way into Christmas before; season one ended with Thanksgiving, season two with the Cuban Missile Crisis in October. And speaking of major sixties events, we get our first Beatles references when Don suggests his secretary Allison pick up some of the band's 45s for his daughter; she for her part is touched by the poignancy of Sally's "Santa" letter to her dad which ends with a wish he could join them Christmas morning though she knows he can't. There's a hint of personal tenderness here that crystallizes before long. Allison has been around since very early in season one, eighteen episodes in all so far, but she's only come up in one of my reviews: when Ken ripped her clothes off in front of a guffawing crowd at the old office's 1960 election party. Now she's in for a different, more subtle form of humiliation: when Don forgets his keys at the Christmas party and she shows up to escort him into his apartment, he quickly seduces her. She's glowing when invited into his office the next morning...only to discover he will only allude to the event in the vaguest terms and has no plans to adjust their professional relationship. Worse, he almost makes it seem as if what happened was simply a byproduct of that workplace hierarchy.

Allison is not the only one deflated by the events of that night...Roger is sadistically brought down several pegs by Lucky Strike owner Lee Garner, Jr. (the man whose harassment of Sal got poor Sal fired). Considering he currently represents virtually all of SCDP's business - despite good old Freddy Rumson returning with an Alcoholic Anonymous-arranged Pond's Cold Cream account under his arm - Lee is able to command a lavish party on whim and force the desperate-to-please admen and women to dance on a string for him, including Roger in a baggy red suit, white beard, and hearty-as-he-can-manage "ho ho ho." Don chooses this moment to sneak out; he'll get plastered (enough so to sleep with his secretary) at another location, discreet, alone, as he often does these days - indeed a few nights beforehand, his nurse neighbor Phoebe (Nora Zehetner) came to his rescue when he collapsed outside his door (she, unlike Allison, escaped his eager embrace). Not that he needs any more excuses to be driven to drink, but Dr. Faye Miller's (Cara Buono's) parting shot certainly doesn't help. Offended by his hasty exit from a meeting in which she asks the staff to tell their life stories, the visiting consumer research psychologist brusquely tells Don he'll "be married again within a year," and then sarcastically apologizes for reminding him that he's a familiar type rather than a unique individual. Regardless, he agrees with her assessment of life's primary challenge: trying to reconcile what you want with what's expected of you.

My Response:

Sorry to Bother You (LEFT OF THE MOVIES podcast #3/LOST IN THE MOVIES podcast #18)



(embedded podcast player fixed at 8:30am - now features the correct episode)

Three years ago, Sorry to Bother You married a radical viewpoint with broad comedy and surrealist fantasy, causing a stir among left-wing viewers in particular who'd been hungering for this kind of pop cultural encapsulation of their own shift in consciousness. I saw the film then and offered my thoughts, and now I'm reviving that discussion at an opportune time. In Bessemer, Alabama next week, Amazon warehouse workers are voting on whether or not to unionize, so Sorry to Bother You's story of a strike at a telemarketing company, against the backdrop of a tech billionaire's diabolical scheme to turn workers into virtual slaves and literal workhorses, seems more relevant than ever. (Meanwhile, the tech billionaire is played by Armie Hammer, whose recent scandals and alleged crime lend an even darker underpinning to the decadent villain he plays onscreen). Boots Riley's film was released at a time when the young left felt as eager and optimistic as it did frustrated and alienated from the status quo. While the bulk of this recording dates from that time, it's worth asking what Sorry to Bother You tells us now in a post-Bernie, post-Trump, and (not quite) post-Covid world. If you have any thoughts, please share them and I'll respond on future episodes.

By the way, this episode has an unusual number of links including many other podcasts covering this film - see below.


Subscribe, rate, and review on Apple Podcasts
You can also listen on Pinecast and Spotify


LINKS FOR EPISODE 18


...including PODCASTS on Sorry to Bother You (available on iTunes as well):








MY RECENT WORK

New on the site




New on Patreon
($1/ month)








Mad Men - "Public Relations" (season 4, episode 1)


Welcome to my viewing diary for Mad Men. Every Monday I will review another episode of seasons four, five, and six. The last season will be covered in the summer of 2022 (now updated to winter 2021-22). I have never seen this series before so there will be NO spoilers.

Story (aired on July 25, 2010/written by Matthew Weiner; directed by Phil Abraham): If the season two premiere showed Don subtly slipping from the dominant perch established in Mad Men's pilot, by November 1964 he has reached his nadir. A lonely bachelor in the city who spends Thanksgiving with a prostitute (Erin Cummings), Don visits his children at his ex-wife's convenience while Betty refuses to move out of the house that he still owns (and where she makes love to her new husband in the garage). As he prepares for a slightly embarrassing date with Bethany (Ann Camp), a friend of Jane Sterling, Don catches his own bleak visage in the mirror and appears to be little more than a shell of a human being. And yet Don should be triumphant. Sterling Cooper Draper Pryce, while uneasy in its less-than-impressive new quarters, rides entirely on his reputation which has only grown since the bold stunt he pulled last fall - hijacking his former agency's star talent before the British buyout took hold. Don is still relatively young, another couple years until forty by my count, and Bethany's reaction to their Chicken Kiev dinner suggests he's still catnip for women of any age. The housing situation may be frustrating but he holds the cards there given the mortgage (cards he attempts to pull when finally demanding Betty and Henry vacate, buy, or pay rent); as Don remarks to his accountant, on paper he's a wealthy man...even if it doesn't feel like it.

What Don lacks is not status or power but that most fragile commodity, the one that has haunted him for three seasons: identity. In fact this psychological black hole eventually threatens his social and material capital. A disastrous interview with Advertising Age, intended to humanize the industry legend and polish the firm's sheen, backfires because Don refuses to give the clearly frustrated writer anything to work with. Because the article fails to mention him, the agency loses that flaky heir whose athletic campaign Pete backed last season - right after Harry bought a television special to promote it. Roger, Bert, and Lane fear further fallout and pressure Don to schedule a rebound sit-down with a friendly Wall Street Journal reporter but Don resists. What else could he do differently? His reticence represents the old-fashioned masculine ideal - achievement speaks for itself and bearing one's soul to earn a little extra coin is considered gauche (Don obviously has his own reasons for this reserve, between his Dick Whitman past and recent divorce). But with New Journalism just a few years away, and edgy mid-sixties pop culture sneering at stodgy stoicism, it's time for a change of pace. After dramatically expelling a couple prudish would-be clients, Don agrees to the Journal interview and presents an entirely new persona: brash and boastful as he takes full credit for the company's creation and success, tactically deploying a fuck-you smirk that's entirely new to his ever-evolving defensive arsenal.

My Response:

Start of Spring update


Exactly nine months ago today, on the cusp of summer, I issued a status update to organize a new schedule for the site and lay out my plans for pursuing unfinished work, primarily two Twin Peaks videos that I'd originally hoped to publish in May. I presumed I'd be caught up with that work within a few weeks, start sharing several posts a week instead of just one, and finish my Journey Through Twin Peaks project in late summer. Instead, those two videos (and life in general) proved so time-consuming that I didn't finish the second until February and only now, at the tail end of winter, am I almost caught up with belated patron obligations (I wrapped my main podcast episode and a half-dozen bonus spin-offs yesterday). For the past forty weeks, I've published just one post every single week - sometimes a simple update to touch base, sometimes a round-up bursting at the seams - to keep the site active. That will change next week when I begin reviewing Mad Men's fourth season, share my latest public podcast, and possibly upload a YouTube video update too; going forward, my online activity will be a little busier with at least one post, but often more, per week.

As announced in that update back in June, each day of the week is reserved for a different type of post - Monday for TV viewing diary, Tuesday for video essay update, Wednesday for written film review, Thursday for podcast cross-post, and/or Friday for random - so whatever I have to share in a week will be released on its respective day. First up, I will finish the "catch-up" phase of my "path through Journey Through Twin Peaks" schedule (with a couple Lost in Twin Peaks episodes kicking off the late season stretch and both public and patron podcasts on Blue Velvet). Then, behind the scenes, I will build up a backlog to take me through September of this year (including a Citizen Kane video for the eightieth anniversary in May and another season of Mad Men episodes, which I've already begun watching and writing about). By June at the latest I hope to be completely focused on Journey Through Twin Peaks again, immersing myself in season three - the material itself, as well as what others have had to say about it - and creating the videos ahead of time before I start sharing them, so that I'm not tripping all over myself as I was with Part 5.

That's the plan, anyway. As the bookends for this period show, plans can change - but I hope you and I enjoy the journey along the way regardless. See you Monday.

Images from a return to Twin Peaks (2 of 2): Mark Frost, Other Collaborators, and The Return


The first collection features many other screenshots from Part 5
(corresponding to chapters 29-33 on YouTube)

This concludes my screenshot collection of all juxtapositions, superimpositions, explanatory titles, collage-like mosaics or other visual manipulations from my video essay series Journey Through Twin Peaks Part 5 - "Over the Mountain Pass". This process has escalated with each part - for Parts 1 and 2, a few screenshots were included alongside the videos; Part 3 featured many more, and by Part 4 there were so many screenshots I needed a whole separate post for them. By Part 5, I had to split this screenshot collection in two, and this round-up right here is over twice as long as the previous one. The Mark Frost section in particular is cluttered with original compositions, which is what happens when you need to visualize the work of someone whose output was frequently literary. As a result, that standalone video on YouTube (chapter 35) took months to create, far longer than any other individual entry in Journey (you can also watch chapter 34, about the original series collaborators, and chapter 36, a chronological journey through the third season, on YouTube). Hopefully this offers an enjoyable opportunity to pause and explore the various comparisons and illustrations on their own, separate from the whole.

The Lobster (LOST IN THE MOVIES podcast #17)



I decided to jump ahead the next episode a week early for reasons explained in the podcast. It will be three weeks till Episode 18, and in the meantime I'll be catching up with Patreon rewards from February and closing off a long period that began last summer as I publish the last pieces (a YouTube announcement and a second round-up of screenshots) related to Journey Through Twin Peaks Part 5. On this episode, I discuss The Lobster, Yorgos Lanthimos' surreal, whimsical, and sometimes quite violent 2015 romance in which single people spend a month at a resort trying to find a mate who matches strict criteria...or else they will be turned into animals. The only alternative is racing off to form a resistance band in the woods where they're now punished if they do fall in love. Colin Farrell and Rachel Weisz are both earnest and amusing as a couple who find themselves in the latter situation, and the film provides a springboard to consider how society molds us in often bewildering and contradictory ways, on the job as well as in relationships. If you have any reflections on this fascinating, eccentric work, let me know, and I'll share your comments when we're back on the normal schedule a few weeks from now.

Subscribe, rate, and review on Apple Podcasts
You can also listen on Pinecast and Spotify


LINKS FOR EPISODE 17
(MY RECENT WORK)


Previously on this podcast



Search This Blog